# monitorss-bot vs Wallabag

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | monitorss-bot | Wallabag |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in RSS | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 1 296 | 13 034 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +51 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v7.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Wallabag scores 73/100 against 58/100 for monitorss-bot, so it is the safer default.

monitorss-bot ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wallabag.

If you want the quickest setup, Wallabag is easier to run; monitorss-bot needs more configuration.

Wallabag is growing faster right now (+51 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [monitorss-bot](https://selfhost.directory/project/monitorss-bot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/monitorss-bot.md)
- [Wallabag](https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/monitorss-bot-vs-wallabag