monitorss-botvspaperclip
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| monitorss-bot | paperclip | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in RSS | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 1 296 | 108 301 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +26 937 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 |
| Latest release | v7.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
paperclip scores 88/100 against 58/100 for monitorss-bot, so it is the safer default.
paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for monitorss-bot.
If you want the quickest setup, paperclip is easier to run; monitorss-bot needs more configuration.
paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 937 stars in 30 days).
monitorss-bot details →paperclip details →
Swap a project
Keep monitorss-bot, compare it with
Keep paperclip, compare it with