# Monitorr vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Monitorr | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #61 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 675 | 38 962 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 396 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 50/100 for Monitorr, so it is the safer default.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 396 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Monitorr](https://selfhost.directory/project/monitorr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/monitorr.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/monitorr-vs-searxng