# Monero vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Monero | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 961 | 45 023 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +90 | +1 622 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.18.5.4 · 15 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 76/100 for Monero, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Monero.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Monero needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Monero](https://selfhost.directory/project/monero) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/monero.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/monero-vs-reactive-resume