# Moltis vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Moltis | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #18 of 120 in AI Assistant | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 928 | 93 060 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 | +1 266 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | 20261023.01 · 23 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 62/100 for Moltis, so it is the safer default.

Moltis ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Moltis needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 266 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Moltis](https://selfhost.directory/project/moltis) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/moltis.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/moltis-vs-uptime-kuma