# mkcertWeb vs PeerTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mkcertWeb | PeerTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Certificate Management | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 221 | 15 376 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +44 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v4.4.3 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 48/100 for mkcertWeb, so it is the safer default.

mkcertWeb ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.

If you want the quickest setup, mkcertWeb is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mkcertWeb](https://selfhost.directory/project/mkcertweb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mkcertweb.md)
- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mkcertweb-vs-peertube