# mitmproxy vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 46 441 ✓ | 2 919 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 306 ✓ | +120 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 64/100 for Zot Registry, so it is the safer default.

Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 306 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-zot-registry