# mitmproxy vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 46 448 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 313 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.19.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 313 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-woodpecker-ci