# mitmproxy vs Wazuh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | Wazuh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 46 448 ✓ | 17 476 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 313 ✓ | +491 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 80/100 for Wazuh, so it is the safer default.

Wazuh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 313 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [Wazuh](https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-wazuh