# mitmproxy vs Vigil365

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | Vigil365 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 46 462 ✓ | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 327 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.

mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.

If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; Vigil365 needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [Vigil365](https://selfhost.directory/project/vigil365) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vigil365.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-vigil365