# mitmproxy vs speedtest-rust

> Two self-hosted [Network Monitoring projects](https://selfhost.directory/network-monitoring), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | speedtest-rust |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 46 459 ✓ | 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 324 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 45/100 for speedtest-rust, so it is the safer default.

mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for speedtest-rust.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [speedtest-rust](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-rust) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-rust.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-speedtest-rust