# mitmproxy vs SpacetimeDB

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | SpacetimeDB |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 46 471 ✓ | 25 407 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 327 ✓ | +85 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 75/100 for SpacetimeDB, so it is the safer default.

SpacetimeDB ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [SpacetimeDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-spacetimedb