# mitmproxy vs Snitch

> Two self-hosted [Network Monitoring projects](https://selfhost.directory/network-monitoring), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | Snitch |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #20 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 46 459 ✓ | 642 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 324 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.6.4 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 54/100 for Snitch, so it is the safer default.

Snitch ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [Snitch](https://selfhost.directory/project/snitch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/snitch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-snitch