# mitmproxy vs ryot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | ryot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 46 471 ✓ | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 327 ✓ | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.

mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [ryot](https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-ryot