# mitmproxy vs ReadMeABook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | ReadMeABook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 46 471 ✓ | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 327 ✓ | +63 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-readmeabook