# mitmproxy vs Postal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | Postal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 16 in Mail Server |
| GitHub stars | 46 468 ✓ | 16 899 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 324 ✓ | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.3.7 · 3 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 72/100 for Postal, so it is the safer default.

mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Postal.

If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; Postal needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [Postal](https://selfhost.directory/project/postal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/postal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-postal