# mitmproxy vs Plane

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | Plane |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 46 462 | 61 626 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 327 | +1 824 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.4.3 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy and Plane score the same (86/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Plane ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; Plane needs more configuration.

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [Plane](https://selfhost.directory/project/plane) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/plane.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenProject vs Plane](https://selfhost.directory/compare/openproject-vs-plane)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-plane