# mitmproxy vs Orca

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | Orca |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 46 462 | 109 022 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 327 | +9 115 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 86/100 for mitmproxy, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 115 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-orca