# mitmproxy vs open·kritt

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | open·kritt |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #24 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 46 462 ✓ | 2 379 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 327 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 5 |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [open·kritt](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-open-kritt