# mitmproxy vs open-compute

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | open-compute |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 46 441 ✓ | 2 361 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 306 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 55/100 for open-compute, so it is the safer default.

open-compute ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 306 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [open-compute](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-compute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-compute.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-open-compute