# mitmproxy vs Nomad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | Nomad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 46 459 ✓ | 17 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 324 ✓ | +80 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-nomad