# mitmproxy vs motionEye

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mitmproxy | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 46 467 ✓ | 4 720 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 323 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 323 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)
- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mitmproxy-vs-motioneye