# MiroTalk C2C vs OpenVidu

> Two self-hosted [Zoom alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/zoom), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MiroTalk C2C | OpenVidu |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 62/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #9 of 33 in Communication |
| GitHub stars | 520 | 2 138 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.9.0 · 30 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenVidu scores 62/100 against 56/100 for MiroTalk C2C, so it is the safer default.

OpenVidu ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for MiroTalk C2C.

If you want the quickest setup, MiroTalk C2C is easier to run; OpenVidu needs more configuration.

MiroTalk C2C is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MiroTalk C2C](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirotalk-c2c) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirotalk-c2c.md)
- [OpenVidu](https://selfhost.directory/project/openvidu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openvidu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirotalk-c2c-vs-openvidu