# MiroTalk C2C vs mirotalkwebrtc

> Two self-hosted [Zoom alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/zoom), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MiroTalk C2C | mirotalkwebrtc |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #20 of 25 in Video Conferencing |
| GitHub stars | 520 ✓ | 364 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

MiroTalk C2C scores 56/100 against 52/100 for mirotalkwebrtc, so it is the safer default.

MiroTalk C2C is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MiroTalk C2C](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirotalk-c2c) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirotalk-c2c.md)
- [mirotalkwebrtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirotalkwebrtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirotalkwebrtc.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirotalk-c2c-vs-mirotalkwebrtc