# Mirobody vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mirobody | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 53 765 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +370 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Mirobody.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+370 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mirobody](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirobody-vs-windowsindocker