# Mirobody vs Vert

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mirobody | Vert |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 16 176 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +543 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Vert scores 71/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.

Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.

If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; Mirobody needs more configuration.

Vert is growing faster right now (+543 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mirobody](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody.md)
- [Vert](https://selfhost.directory/project/vert) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vert.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirobody-vs-vert