# Mirobody vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mirobody | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 3 622 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +5 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

Urbit scores 63/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.

Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, Mirobody is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mirobody](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirobody-vs-urbit