# Mirobody vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mirobody | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 45 023 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 622 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Mirobody.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mirobody](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirobody-vs-reactive-resume