# Mirobody vs Radarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mirobody | Radarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 14 671 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +240 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Mirobody.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; Mirobody needs more configuration.

Radarr is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mirobody](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody.md)
- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirobody-vs-radarr