# Mirobody vs Qinglong

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mirobody | Qinglong |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 396 | 20 023 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Qinglong scores 69/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.

Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Qinglong.

If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; Mirobody needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Mirobody](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody.md)
- [Qinglong](https://selfhost.directory/project/qinglong) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qinglong.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirobody-vs-qinglong