# Mirobody vs PostgREST

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mirobody | PostgREST |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 27 737 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +60 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Haskell |

## Which one should you pick?

PostgREST scores 79/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.

PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Mirobody.

If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; Mirobody needs more configuration.

PostgREST is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mirobody](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody.md)
- [PostgREST](https://selfhost.directory/project/postgrest) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/postgrest.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirobody-vs-postgrest