# Mirobody vs PhotoPrism

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mirobody | PhotoPrism |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 40 370 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +135 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.

Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+135 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mirobody](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody.md)
- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirobody-vs-photoprism