# Mirobody vs OpenScribe

> Two self-hosted [Healthcare projects](https://selfhost.directory/healthcare), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mirobody | OpenScribe |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #4 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 1 396 ✓ | 223 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Mirobody scores 56/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.

Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenScribe.

## Details

- [Mirobody](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody.md)
- [OpenScribe](https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirobody-vs-openscribe