# Mirobody vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mirobody | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +34 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Mirobody.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mirobody](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirobody-vs-openreader