# Mirobody vs OpenEMR

> Two self-hosted [Healthcare projects](https://selfhost.directory/healthcare), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mirobody | OpenEMR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 1 396 | 5 555 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +89 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenEMR scores 72/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.

Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.

If you want the quickest setup, Mirobody is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

OpenEMR is growing faster right now (+89 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mirobody](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirobody.md)
- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mirobody-vs-openemr