# mira-OSS vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mira-OSS | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #47 of 120 in AI Assistant | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 481 | 393 295 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 947 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2026.10.21-2.1.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 49/100 for mira-OSS, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for mira-OSS.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; mira-OSS needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 947 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mira-OSS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mira-oss) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mira-oss.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mira-oss-vs-openclaw