# mira-OSS vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mira-OSS | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #47 of 120 in AI Assistant | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 481 | 92 975 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +58 034 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2026.10.21-2.1.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 49/100 for mira-OSS, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for mira-OSS.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; mira-OSS needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 034 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mira-OSS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mira-oss) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mira-oss.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mira-oss-vs-omnivoice-studio