MintHCMvsqdrant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MintHCM | qdrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 9 in Human Resource Management (HRM) | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 439 | 35 299 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +528 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 14 |
| Latest release | 4.3.5 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 51/100 for MintHCM, so it is the safer default.
qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for MintHCM.
If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; MintHCM needs more configuration.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+528 stars in 30 days).
MintHCM details →qdrant details →