# minisatip vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | minisatip | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #33 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 373 | 61 541 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +497 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.0.179 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 52/100 for minisatip, so it is the safer default.

minisatip ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; minisatip needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [minisatip](https://selfhost.directory/project/minisatip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/minisatip.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/minisatip-vs-pi-hole