# Miniflux vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Miniflux | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 85 in Feed Reader | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 9 854 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +121 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 2.3.4 · 19 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Miniflux scores 73/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Miniflux ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Miniflux is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Miniflux](https://selfhost.directory/project/miniflux) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/miniflux.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/miniflux-vs-tube-archivist