minecraftvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| minecraft | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 62 in Game Servers | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 14 491 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +160 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
minecraft scores 78/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
minecraft ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, minecraft is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.
minecraft is growing faster right now (+160 stars in 30 days).
minecraft details →supabase-automated-self-host details →