minecraftvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| minecraft | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 62 in Game Servers | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 492 | 44 995 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +161 | +1 622 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 34 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 78/100 for minecraft, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 22 for minecraft.
If you want the quickest setup, minecraft is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).
minecraft details →Reactive Resume details →