minecraftvsRabbitMQ
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| minecraft | RabbitMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 62 in Game Servers | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 14 491 | 13 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +159 | +74 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 14 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Shell | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
minecraft scores 78/100 against 77/100 for RabbitMQ, so it is the safer default.
minecraft ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for RabbitMQ.
If you want the quickest setup, minecraft is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.
minecraft is growing faster right now (+159 stars in 30 days).
minecraft details →RabbitMQ details →
Swap a project
Keep minecraft, compare it with
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with