# MikroDash vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MikroDash | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 633 | 89 721 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 382 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for MikroDash.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 382 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mikrodash-vs-world-monitor