# MikroDash vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MikroDash | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 633 | 53 720 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +325 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for MikroDash.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; WindowsinDocker needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+325 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mikrodash-vs-windowsindocker