# MikroDash vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MikroDash | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 633 | 38 967 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 355 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

MikroDash ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 355 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mikrodash-vs-searxng