# MikroDash vs ReadMeABook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MikroDash | ReadMeABook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 633 | 1 034 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +64 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for MikroDash.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)
- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mikrodash-vs-readmeabook