# MikroDash vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MikroDash | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 633 | 393 343 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 919 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for MikroDash.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 919 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mikrodash-vs-openclaw