# MikroDash vs Nomad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MikroDash | Nomad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 633 | 17 057 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +84 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Nomad scores 77/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for MikroDash.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.

Nomad is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)
- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mikrodash-vs-nomad