# Mikochi vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mikochi | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #18 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 378 | 24 049 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +789 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.12.2 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 50/100 for Mikochi, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Mikochi is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+789 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mikochi](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikochi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikochi.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mikochi-vs-temporal